-
Bynum Dickey posted an update 3 days, 14 hours ago
Olfactory receptor (OR) 1A2 is the member of largest superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). OR1A2 is an ectopically expressed receptor with only 13 known ligands, implicated in reducing hepatocellular carcinoma progression, with enormous therapeutic potential. selleck We have developed a two-stage screening approach to identify novel putative ligands of OR1A2. We first used a pharmacophore model based on atomic property field (APF) to virtually screen a library of 5942 human metabolites. We then carried out structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) for predicting the potential agonists, based on a 3D homology model of OR1A2. This model was developed using a biophysical approach for template selection, based on multiple parameters including hydrophobicity correspondence, applied to the complete set of available GPCR structures to pick the most appropriate template. Finally, the membrane-embedded 3D model was refined by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in both the apo and holo forms. The refined model in the apo form was selected for SBVS. Four novel small molecules were identified as strong binders to this olfactory receptor on the basis of computed binding energies.There is little structural information about the protein complexes conferring resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) to anti-microbial oxygen and nitrogen radicals in the phagolysosome. Here, we expose the model Mycobacterium, Mycobacterium smegmatis, to simulated oxidative-stress conditions and apply a shotgun EM method for the structural detection of the resulting protein assemblies. We identified glutamine synthetase I, essential for Mtb virulence; bacterioferritin A, critical for Mtb iron regulation; aspartyl aminopeptidase M18, a protease; and encapsulin, which produces a cage-like structure to enclose cargo proteins. After further investigation, we found that encapsulin carries dye-decolourising peroxidase, a protein antioxidant, as its primary cargo under the conditions tested.Studies of protein allostery increasingly reveal an involvement of the back and forth order-disorder transitions in this mechanism of protein activity regulation. Here, we investigate the allosteric mechanisms mediated by structural disorder using the structure-based statistical mechanical model of allostery (SBSMMA) that we have previously developed. We show that SBSMMA accounts for the energetics and causality of allosteric communication underlying dimerization of the BirA biotin repressor, activation of the sortase A enzyme, and inhibition of the Rac1 GTPase. Using the SBSMMA, we also show that introducing structural order or disorder in various regions of esterases can originate tunable allosteric modulation of the catalytic triad. On the basis of obtained results, we propose that operating with the order-disorder continuum allows one to establish an allosteric control scale for achieving desired modulation of the protein activity.Two mechanisms, induced fit (IF) and conformational selection (CS), have been proposed to explain ligand recognition coupled conformational changes. The histidine binding protein (HisJ) adopts the CS mechanism, in which a pre-equilibrium is established between the open and the closed states with the ligand binding to the closed state. Despite being structurally similar to HisJ, the maltose binding protein (MBP) adopts the IF mechanism, in which the ligand binds the open state and induces a transition to the closed state. To understand the molecular determinants of this difference, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of coarse-grained dual structure based models. We find that intra-protein contacts unique to the closed state are sufficient to promote the conformational transition in HisJ, indicating a CS-like mechanism. In contrast, additional ligand-mimicking contacts are required to “induce” the conformational transition in MBP suggesting an IF-like mechanism. In agreement with experiments, destabilizing modifications to two structural features, the spine helix (SH) and the balancing interface (BI), present in MBP but absent in HisJ, reduce the need for ligand-mimicking contacts indicating that SH and BI act as structural restraints that keep MBP in the open state. We introduce an SH like element into HisJ and observe that this can impede the conformational transition increasing the importance of ligand-mimicking contacts. Similarly, simultaneous mutations to BI and SH in MBP reduce the barrier to conformational transitions significantly and promote a CS-like mechanism. Together, our results show that structural restraints present in the protein structure can determine the mechanism of conformational transitions and even simple models that correctly capture such structural features can predict their positions. MD simulations of such models can thus be used, in conjunction with mutational experiments, to regulate protein ligand interactions, and modulate ligand binding affinities.Trimeric photosystem I from the cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus (TePSI) is an intrinsic membrane protein, which converts solar energy into electrical energy by oxidizing the soluble redox mediator cytochrome c 6 (Cyt c 6 ) and reducing ferredoxin. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) to characterize the transient binding of Cyt c 6 to TePSI. The structure of TePSI cross-linked to Cyt c 6 was solved at a resolution of 2.9 Å and shows additional cofactors as well as side chain density for 84% of the peptide chain of subunit PsaK, revealing a hydrophobic, membrane intrinsic loop that enables binding of associated proteins. Due to the poor binding specificity, Cyt c 6 could not be localized with certainty in our cryo-EM analysis. SANS measurements confirm that Cyt c 6 does not bind to TePSI at protein concentrations comparable to those for cross-linking. However, SANS data indicate a complex formation between TePSI and the non-native mitochondrial cytochrome from horse heart (Cyt c HH ). Our study pinpoints the difficulty of identifying very small binding partners (less than 5% of the overall size) in EM structures when binding affinities are poor. We relate our results to well resolved co-structures with known binding affinities and recommend confirmatory methods for complexes with K M values higher than 20 μM.